Sher Raisa Petrovna
Kazakhstani statesman,
Former deputy of the Majilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan of the first convocation,
Member of the Expert Council and Secretary of the Coordination Council
Member of the Expert Council and Secretary of the Coordinating Council under the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan,
Member of the Public Foundation “National Endowment for Prosperity”
Kazakhstan, being a party to the main international legal treaty mechanisms in the field of human rights, firmly adheres to the policy of zero tolerance to torture and violence, and continues to work to improve the human rights situation, including reforms in the justice system and the fight against torture.
An article published by biased NGOs in the media about inaction to combat torture is not just perplexing, but outrageous.
Recently, on April 25 of this year, the representatives of human rights NGOs mentioned in the article took an active part in the presentation of the Consolidated Report on the results of visits to institutions by NPM participants on this very topic. During the discussion, they all agreed that, especially in recent years, the effectiveness of documentation of facts of torture and ill-treatment has increased, the prosecution and punishment of perpetrators has increased and not been silenced, and inter-agency mechanisms of interaction have been strengthened.
Instead of seeking transparency and supporting these efforts, the actions of individual NGOs are aimed at discrediting and undermining the trust of citizens, which certainly hinders real measures to improve the human rights situation in Kazakhstan.
With regard to the adoption of a separate law on NPMs, this issue does give rise to active discussions and different opinions. It is important to take into account that the creation of effective legislation requires time, consultations and harmonization of the interests of all parties. Promises at a conference last spring by the NGOs mentioned in the article that initiatives would be taken to discuss and finalize this document were never followed through.
Sometimes, it seems that some human rights organizations are not always eager to engage in a common dialogue, especially in the context of issues related to the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM).
The use of their aggressive propaganda, inaccurate and one-sided information, creates unnecessary tension, hinders development and stability in the country by swaying the situation with implausible accusations.
As citizens of our country, we cannot remain silent and inactive; it is important to counter disinformation in a timely manner and protect national interests. Ultimately, it is about protecting the country's reputation.
When accusations are made without concrete evidence, references to facts or official sources, there is a risk of disseminating inaccurate information that can damage the image of the State and undermine confidence in its institutions. In cases such as this one, it is important to hold accountable the dissemination of biased and defamatory information in order to strike a balance and protect the country's reputation.
Kazakhstani statesman,
Former deputy of the Majilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan of the first convocation,
Member of the Expert Council and Secretary of the Coordination Council
Member of the Expert Council and Secretary of the Coordinating Council under the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan,
Member of the Public Foundation “National Endowment for Prosperity”
Kazakhstan, being a party to the main international legal treaty mechanisms in the field of human rights, firmly adheres to the policy of zero tolerance to torture and violence, and continues to work to improve the human rights situation, including reforms in the justice system and the fight against torture.
An article published by biased NGOs in the media about inaction to combat torture is not just perplexing, but outrageous.
Recently, on April 25 of this year, the representatives of human rights NGOs mentioned in the article took an active part in the presentation of the Consolidated Report on the results of visits to institutions by NPM participants on this very topic. During the discussion, they all agreed that, especially in recent years, the effectiveness of documentation of facts of torture and ill-treatment has increased, the prosecution and punishment of perpetrators has increased and not been silenced, and inter-agency mechanisms of interaction have been strengthened.
Instead of seeking transparency and supporting these efforts, the actions of individual NGOs are aimed at discrediting and undermining the trust of citizens, which certainly hinders real measures to improve the human rights situation in Kazakhstan.
With regard to the adoption of a separate law on NPMs, this issue does give rise to active discussions and different opinions. It is important to take into account that the creation of effective legislation requires time, consultations and harmonization of the interests of all parties. Promises at a conference last spring by the NGOs mentioned in the article that initiatives would be taken to discuss and finalize this document were never followed through.
Sometimes, it seems that some human rights organizations are not always eager to engage in a common dialogue, especially in the context of issues related to the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM).
The use of their aggressive propaganda, inaccurate and one-sided information, creates unnecessary tension, hinders development and stability in the country by swaying the situation with implausible accusations.
As citizens of our country, we cannot remain silent and inactive; it is important to counter disinformation in a timely manner and protect national interests. Ultimately, it is about protecting the country's reputation.
When accusations are made without concrete evidence, references to facts or official sources, there is a risk of disseminating inaccurate information that can damage the image of the State and undermine confidence in its institutions. In cases such as this one, it is important to hold accountable the dissemination of biased and defamatory information in order to strike a balance and protect the country's reputation.